Finally we discuss gene splicing and the ethics behind it! This topic is probably the most interesting to me out of everything we have studied thus far because it is just so fun. I'm reminding of the horror movie Splice in which two doctors mix animal and human genes to create a "daughter." The underlying message of Splice was that mixing of genes is dangerous, but is that really so?
One major concern you'll always hear about is genetically modified food. Videos such as this McDonald's experiment freaks people out and worries them about what they are putting into their bodies.
However, I have learned in other classes such as my Geography 5 class that the risks of eating GMF is actually the same as eating regular food. They are not specifically worse and, if anything, the genetic changes help fast production and mass availability across the globe. I am a supporter of these foods (although it is worrisome that some of these foods are becoming "drug-like" to us).
Resources
Combs, Chris. "Glowing Animals: Beasts Shining for Science." National Geographic. National Geographic Society, 14 May 2009. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
"Joe Davis: Genetics and Culture." Joe Davis: Genetics and Culture. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
Kac, Eduardo. "GFP BUNNY." GFP BUNNY. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
"Splice." The Pinocchio Theory. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
Wenk, Gary. "This Is Your Brain on Food." SEEDMAGAZINE.COM. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
I agree with your points in not restricting art, but only to an extent. However, do you have any ethical or moral parameters that need to be set for artists? Science already has certain parameters which cannot be crossed. Should Art also have the same parameters implemented? Or do you think that Art should be free of all restrictions? I forsee some sticky/dangerous situations if art is truly free.
ReplyDelete